Tasić, Slaviša (2016) The Pitfalls of Legislative and Executive Policymaking Compared to Judge-Made Law. The Journal of Private Enterprise, 31 (4). pp. 43-63. ISSN 0890-913X
Text
the pitfalls 2016.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (251kB) |
Official URL: http://journal.apee.org/index.php?title=2016_Journ...
Abstract
This article uses insights from cognitive psyhology to contrast judge-made law with legislative and executive policymaking. I argue that the predominant narrow conceptions of reason and rationality have led to overly optimistic views of deliberate policymaking at the expense of traditional judge-made law. However, alternative views of what constitutes rationality suggest that judge-made law may have some often overlooked advantages over deliberate policymaking.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | COBISS.ID=512580194 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | rules, judiciary, experts, heuristics, ecological rationality |
Research Department: | Other |
Depositing User: | Jelena Banovic |
Date Deposited: | 26 Nov 2019 09:44 |
Last Modified: | 09 Feb 2021 14:24 |
URI: | http://ebooks.ien.bg.ac.rs/id/eprint/1380 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |